Earlier campaign account / Solar SEO & website design
A solar website rebuild, followed through search visibility.
AMÁRQUEZ's earlier account for an anonymous solar company describes a website rebuild, service and location content, and a search strategy. It reports changes in search visibility between January 2025 and April 2026. Those counts describe the published comparison; they do not establish enquiries or completed installations.
Discuss your website and SEOWhat problem did the account describe?
The published narrative describes an outdated website and limited organic search visibility. The company wanted a website that search engines could understand and customers could use when researching solar installation.
The account reports 150 total keywords and eight positions in the top three at its starting point. The source does not identify the client, its location or the search tool used to produce those counts.
What work does the account describe?
A website rebuild
The earlier account describes designing and developing a new website with a clearer architecture. That was part of the campaign approach, rather than evidence by itself that the site generated more installations.
Service content, location pages and internal links
The account describes service and location pages, structured data and internal linking as parts of the SEO foundation. These tasks were intended to explain the company's work and connect relevant information across the site.
Content for AI search visibility
The narrative also describes structuring content for AI Overviews. Its results table contains an “AI Overviews” count, but does not define how that count was collected or whether it refers to searches, pages or citations.
What comparison was published?
The earlier page compares January 2025 with April 2026, a 15-month interval. The table below retains its before-and-after counts. They are reported figures from the published account, rather than independently verified measurements.
| Reported measure | January 2025 | April 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Reported total keywords | 150 | 503 |
| Positions 1–3 | 8 | 23 |
| Positions 4–10 | 20 | 35 |
| Positions 11–20 | 7 | 43 |
| Positions 21–50 | 44 | 143 |
| “AI Overviews” count (source label) | 0 | 7 |
| “SERP Features” count (source label) | 24 | 70 |
The reported total increased from 150 to 503 keywords. Position ranges are shown numerically: positions 11–20 are separate from positions 4–10. The source does not provide the underlying keyword list, explain the counting method or define its SERP Features category.
What do these counts establish, and what do they leave open?
The published figures show a larger reported keyword inventory and more entries in the listed position ranges at the later comparison point. They do not establish organic visits, qualified enquiries, completed installations, revenue or profit.
The source provides no underlying ranking export, search database, market, device setting or consistent keyword sample with which to check the comparison. A changing keyword inventory can affect the totals, and a before-and-after account cannot isolate the effect of the website rebuild from other changes.
The change from zero to seven “AI Overviews” entries needs a defined measurement before it can be described as seven citations. A zero in that category does not establish that the company was absent from every AI search platform.
The account therefore supports an attributed description of the work and its published comparison. It does not support promises that results will keep accelerating or that another solar company will achieve the same outcome.
How can a solar company use this approach?
Start with the services and locations your team can actually cover. Give customers enough information to understand the offer and contact someone who can help. Review crawl access and internal links alongside the clarity of the content.
Agree which searches and markets will be measured, then record enquiries and installations separately from ranking counts. Our solar marketing guide connects those decisions with capacity and enquiry handling. The SEO and Google Ads comparison helps frame the choice of channel.
About this campaign account
Source: AMÁRQUEZ's earlier published account for an anonymous solar company, including its January 2025–April 2026 comparison. This revision preserves the reported work and seven count pairs while explaining the missing measurement context. The comparison months are not a publication date; the original source provides no named author or publication date.
This organic-search account is separate from the Fresno solar installer's Local Services Ads comparison and the Fresno roofing and solar paid-campaign account. Their figures concern other campaign accounts and are not combined here.